Balance and Perspective The Alberta Teachers Association released a toolkit for creating curriculum dealing with and minority genders.
The complainant, Greg Murphy, questioned the balance and fairness of an article about the handbook framed by the objections raised by a critic. He thought it misrepresented the document and distorted its meaning. There were other perspectives in the piece, and other articles on the subject. I note that you initially sent an email to this office on November 2nd, 2016, the day the article was published. Unfortunately we never received it, it never arrived, and it wasn until you inquired about it on December 19 that the process began. At no point is there a suggestion that drag shows be used in any other context or to teach any other group of students. You considered this a lack of nuance you saw throughout the report. You said that the article focused its attention on one blogger who was critical and did not provide enough information about the report itself. It reduces a comprehensive document about inclusion to two or three specific oakley factory store ideas (presented without context), and serves to further stigmatize children and teens who already face intense discrimination and bullying, and the host of physical and mental health problems that follow. It legitimizes the panic narrative that leads to bullying and discrimination in the first place. You also had concerns about the use of language in the article. Not only did it violate CBC Journalistic Standards relating to balance and fairness, but also its many provisions on the use of language, in particular the guidelines on oakly sunglasses and precision, level and good taste and and absence of prejudiceit repeats the views of the blogger without attribution and functionally parrots the blog post, giving a national platform to Theresa Ng intolerant and anti government viewpoints. He explained that the focus of the story was the 150 page Prism booklet, which had just been distributed to Alberta schools. He said that there was opposition to the publication, so the of controversy, of opposing views is the thread throughout the story. The story first sentence says the booklet is being by critics for suggesting schools should stage drag shows and address students as rather than boys and girls both salient issues in the mind of critics. The third paragraph adds more context saying the booklet is the latest in a divisive battle over LGBTQ rights for students, pitting advocates against religious and parental groups She explained that quoting from Theresa Ng blog was a device for representing the critics of the material because her concerns and objections are fairly typical of those opposed to the Prism initiative. In her blog, Ms. Ng cited the example of using drag shows as a way to teach cosmetology. Ms. Ng also voiced her objections to the suggestion of using comrade as a gender neutral term for addressing children, as well as other non gendered language to refer to parents. Ms. Geddes pointed out that there were other perspectives in the story that of the Alberta Teachers Association head of the human rights and diversity division, as well as the Education Ministry chief of staff who spoke in defense of the initiative. Andrea Berg, head of the ATA human rights and diversity division is also quoted at some length talking about how teachers had seen a need for help in creating a caring, safe and inclusive learning environment for their students. She said it includes advice for teachers on students come out and about their sexual or gender orientation It also offers advice on with homophobic and transphobic behaviour she said. And, she explained in the story that the shows that had drawn so much fire were only recommended as an activity. We are mindful of their rights. Our content on all platforms presents a wide range of subject matter and views. You think this story lacked balance because its perspective is based on criticism of the document. I asked Ms. Huncar why, since the Prism toolkit was just about to be released, this theme was chosen for the first story on it. She told me that it had not been widely distributed yet, and it was the critics of the toolkit that had alerted the newsroom of its existence. She thought the opposition was a newsworthy element. She pointed out that there was a wider context for this as well the issue of LGBTQ rights and creating a more inclusive environment in Alberta classrooms had been a very controversial and divisive issue for at least a couple of years. It is a valid journalistic choice to present the views of those opposed, even when they express them in strong terms. The question of framing is a nuanced one. You might not agree with framing the article in this fashion, but it did have a broader context, and sunglasses by oakley it did include other perspectives and voices.
If only the critic was quoted or present, you would have a point. A spokesperson for the Alberta Teachers Association is quoted at some length: Andrea Berg, head of the ATA human rights and diversity division, said the toolkit was created based on demand following a similar document released oakley sunglasses promotion four years ago for elementary school teachers.
Next: oakley a frame sunglasses